Dia-fuckin’-fine

51210023

Hole in the wall. Abandoned Nike-Hercules base “Site Bay” in Alaska. Fomapan 100 at ISO 120 processed in Diafine.

I want to introduce you to my newest friend, Diafine. It’s a great developer for lazy asses like me who like to shoot lots of different films at different speeds, including pushed a stop or two, and don’t like to hassle with specific temperatures and times and all of that nonsense.

With typical one-bath, one-shot developers, you simply immerse the film in the developer allowing a reaction to happen. You have to process for a specific amount of time depending on the film and your desired push/pull. During this time fresh developer (supplied by agitation) reacts with the film emulsion and then you dump the spent developer.

Diafine is magic because it’s a two-bath developer. You immerse the film in bath A for three or more minutes (every film is the same) which is how long it should take to fully saturate the emulsion. Then, the film — still holding the bath A chemical it soaked up — is exposed to bath B and the two chemicals react together with the film emulsion. Because there is a limited supply of bath A contained within the emulsion to react with the bath B chemical, this leads to some interesting results: Continue reading

Home Processing: attempt #1

So this weekend I had a vasectomy. Good times! The rest of my family went on a trip out of town while I had nothing to do but sit around and be lazy (with good reason). Coincidentally, I made a splurge (for my broke ass) and bought the stuff I need to home-process 35mm black and white film. So in the week leading up to my snip snip I went out and about and burned two rolls of Ilford HP5+ so that I’d have something to do while my junk was on the mend and I had no one around to worry about opening the “darkroom” (read: bathroom) door.

The basis of my procedure was this article on Lomography. Now I gotta tell you guys something: I work quick, dirty, and sloppy. I cut corners if it saves me a few bucks (otherwise I’d probably just let the lab process my film for me) or significant effort. The process in that article seemed to get good results, so I suggest following it in general. I’m going to go through the areas where I deviated and point out what worked well and what didn’t. Continue reading

Stairwell jungle

Ship Creek. Anchorage, AK. Feb 2016.

Anchorage, AK. Minolta SRT-101. Vivitar 28mm 1:2.8. Kodak T-Max 400.

In the stairwell of the building where I work someone has made a jungle. I used to go like to sit in there on my break and hang out or take a nap, but one day someone put about a dozen plants of various species and sizes in my sunny spot! Anyway, I just thought this plant looked cool and the way the sun came in the window was interesting, and a good opportunity to get close up to something.

First two rolls

So earlier this week my first two rolls of 35mm film were processed and scanned! The downloading was quite the arduous process as I had to do it via my work wifi which sucks balls. But I got them, and overall I’m happy with the results; but there were definitely quite a few “learning experiences” in there too!

Both were shot on my Minolta SRT-101 with a Vivitar 28mm 1:28 lens, Lomography Lady Grey 400 film (which, it turns out, is Kodak T-Max 400 with a different sticker on it!). I sent the rolls out to PhotoVision in Salem, Oregon. I’m happy with their work and they set up a folder in their BOX account with both rolls in it, and presumably future orders will be found there as well, which is pretty cool. Continue reading